BENCHMARK PROFILE
Renova Peptides
Latest sync: Oct 14, 2026, 12:07 AM. Source coverage currently reflects PB Evidence data.
Readers comparing an openly priced U.S. catalog who want single-vial and 10-vial pack prices and will read the client name on each certificate before treating it as this storefront’s own test.
Vendor-stated: Beastmode Labs LLC (DBA Renova Peptides), 17515 Spring Cypress, Cypress, TX 77429; 281-800-9582; Monday–Friday 9:00 AM–5:00 PM EST. The shipping page lists a 2:00 PM EST cutoff, UPS Ground or 2nd Day Air at $15, UPS Next Day Air at $39, and USPS Priority Mail for P.O. boxes. Thermal protection is a separate add-on. That same shipping page says carrier estimates are not guaranteed by Reta One Labs, which is a different Cypress business. Research-use-only. Observed October 9, 2026.
TRZ-2 and GLP TR map to tirzepatide. RT-3 and GLP RT map to retatrutide. Ten-vial listings are packs, not one large vial. The GLP RT kit description mentions a 70 mg size that is not a purchasable kit option; the single RT-3 listing does include 70 mg. PT-141’s page and vial photo do not state a milligram amount, so it is not on the pricing board. Glutathione was out of stock on October 9, 2026. Bacteriostatic water and thermal packaging stay off the peptide board. Kovera images on the certificates page are issued to Reta One Labs, a different Cypress storefront, and are excluded. Vanguard reports name Renova Peptidos and are not in that laboratory’s public index. The shipping page says carrier estimates are not guaranteed by Reta One Labs. PeptideBenchmark has no affiliate or sponsorship relationship. The vendor does publish an affiliate application.
A Cypress, Texas storefront (Beastmode Labs LLC, doing business as Renova Peptides) with public single-vial and 10-vial prices and a public certificate page of vendor-hosted Vanguard Laboratory images.
Renova Peptides publishes a priced research catalog and a public certificates page. TRZ-2 and GLP TR are the storefront names for tirzepatide; RT-3 and GLP RT are the storefront names for retatrutide. The 10-vial products are separate pack prices. Vanguard Laboratory images on the certificates page print Renova Peptidos and are not in that laboratory’s public index, so they stay vendor-hosted documents. Kovera images on the same page resolve to Reta One Labs, a different Cypress storefront, and are not counted as Renova evidence.
The public certificates page hosts batch images and a few PDFs, including older lots. Vanguard Laboratory reports printed for Renova Peptidos stay vendor-hosted documents; Vanguard’s public certificate index does not list this client. Kovera report codes on the same page were checked at the laboratory, and those PDFs name Reta One Labs rather than Renova Peptides, so they are not counted. A vendor-hosted certificate documents the tested sample and the panels printed on that image. It does not cover a product with no certificate, every vial in a pack, or a panel the document does not report.
This vendor is one of 131 names currently included in our manual curated research-vendor layer.
This is a meaningful public transparency pattern, but the documents are still mostly hosted on the vendor side. That makes it stronger than generic claims and weaker than provider-controlled verification.
- Reward the fact that readers can inspect real files without logging in.
- Pay attention to whether the archive is broad, multi-category, or repeated across many products.
- Keep in mind that vendor-hosted files are different from a live third-party verification portal.
This vendor makes the most sense when you compare it to other vendors using a similar transparency model, rather than to every vendor on the board at once.
PB Curated Assessment is a PeptideBenchmark-authored rubric built from the trust and transparency review layer. It is separate from the source-derived benchmark score.
Renova Peptides has enough public trust structure to be useful in the curated set, even if it is not one of the clearest verification leaders yet.
Readers can inspect real public documents, even if the vendor still hosts most of the archive.
The trust layer is structured and inspectable, but still mostly vendor-controlled.
Current review touched 30 products and 15 document/link destinations.
1 named lab signal(s) and 1 certification category signal(s) are currently visible in the reviewed evidence.
Score 3.2 from pb evidence score.
PB Curated Assessment: Promising. This is our own trust/transparency rubric and is kept separate from the PB score.
Holding a certificate for this vendor that is not here? Send it to the archive →
Same third-party review signals shown on the vendor board. Click Trustpilot or Pep Review Pro to open the source profile.
PB score is the number you should read first on this page. It starts with trust evidence, pricing coverage, and third-party review signals from Finnrick, Peptide Critic, Trustpilot, and Pep Review Pro when available. Reviewed transparency evidence contributes a bounded amount — shown as a trust lift for source-benchmarked vendors, and folded into the base score for PB-evidence vendors.
This vendor’s score is evidence-first: verifiable testing evidence forms the backbone, and outside review sources are a bounded adjustment that can warn far more than it can boost. The terms below sum to the displayed score (small rounding aside). Full formula on the scoring methodology page.
WHAT THIS PAGE IS
- Board-ranked vendor profile with source-linked benchmark inputs
- No Finnrick score currently linked
- No Peptide Critic score currently linked
- No Trustpilot profile currently linked
- No Pep Review Pro profile currently linked
CURRENT LIMITS
- Not an original lab test or editorial review
- Source scales and methodologies differ across sites
- Depends on source site freshness and formatting
METHODOLOGY
How to read this benchmark
This profile summarizes public benchmark data synced from Finnrick and, when available, Peptide Critic. Finnrick contributes a 10-point average from its vendor table, while Peptide Critic contributes a 5-star rating that we normalize to a 10-point scale before ranking consensus entries.
A high score can be directionally useful, but it is not a substitute for current COAs, identity testing, chain-of-custody details, or your own due diligence. We are intentionally separating source aggregation from first-party editorial claims.
Scores combine PB trust evidence with external signals from Finnrick, Peptide Critic, Trustpilot, and Pep Review Pro when available.