BENCHMARK PROFILE
PS Peptides
Latest sync: Oct 3, 2026, 9:44 AM. Source coverage currently reflects PB Evidence data.
REFERRAL OFFER
10% off with disclosed code
Cart-verified September 25, 2026 on Hexarelin 10 mg: regular $59.99, code BENCHMARK took $6.00 off (10%). The referral link https://pspeptides.com/?ref=benchmark sets an sa_ref cookie for 90 days and does not apply that discount by itself. The dashboard 18% figure is partner commission, not a second shopper discount.
PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with PS Peptides. This does not change benchmark scores or trust ratings — it only affects outbound links and pricing-board discount modeling where applicable.
Readers who want a broad U.S. vial catalog and a public certificate library that can be checked at the issuing laboratory.
Vendor-stated: a 25-person team based in New Jersey, with U.S. manufacturing and shipping. No street address is published on the contact page. Orders placed before noon Eastern typically ship the same business day. Free shipping on any order, and free UPS 2nd Day Air over $200, were advertised on September 24, 2026. Email support, 7 days, 9am–10pm Eastern.
Ready sprays and tablet bottles are compared on their own lanes, not against reconstitution vials. The GHK-Cu skin serum and the Cut & Glow multi-vial bundle stay off those lanes. Accessory kits and pen supplies stay off the peptide comparison. AHK-Cu vials and GHK-Cu tablets were out of stock on the review date. As of September 25, 2026, code BENCHMARK is 10% off and product links add ?ref=benchmark. The relationship does not change the September 24 evidence findings or the score.
A New Jersey research storefront with public vial prices and a large certificate library; many reports can be checked at North American Diagnostics under ProSupply Peptides | pspeptides.com.
PS Peptides lists single-vial research peptides with milligram options on the public catalog. The certifications page publishes laboratory PDFs for current and older batches. Ranked prices apply the cart-checked code BENCHMARK, 10% off the regular list price. The referral link records the visit and does not apply that discount by itself.
The public certifications page hosts laboratory PDFs, with confirmed matches at North American Diagnostics under the client ProSupply Peptides | pspeptides.com. The library includes separate analytical, heavy-metals, endotoxin, sterility, and fentanyl-screen reports. A result in one document does not establish the results of another; check the report for the relevant product and lot.
This vendor is one of 130 names currently included in our manual curated research-vendor layer.
This is the strongest public transparency pattern on the site. The key signal is that readers can leave the vendor domain and inspect reports or verification pages on an outside provider domain without needing to log in.
- Treat the outside provider route as the strongest part of the evidence, not the vendor marketing copy around it.
- Look for repeated product-level behavior across the catalog, not just one showcase example.
- Do not overread it as proof that every current lot is covered or current unless the linked report trail itself supports that.
This vendor makes the most sense when you compare it to other vendors using a similar transparency model, rather than to every vendor on the board at once.
PB Curated Assessment is a PeptideBenchmark-authored rubric built from the trust and transparency review layer. It is separate from the source-derived benchmark score.
PS Peptides is currently one of the strongest curated cases on the site because readers can inspect a repeatable public evidence trail without logging in.
Readers can leave the vendor marketing layer and inspect verification publicly.
This is the strongest public pattern because the verification step routes into an outside provider layer.
Current review touched 118 products and 533 document/link destinations.
1 named lab signal(s) and 1 certification category signal(s) are currently visible in the reviewed evidence.
Score 8.3 from pb evidence score.
PB Curated Assessment: Strong. This is our own trust/transparency rubric and is kept separate from the PB score.
Assayed content is not fill accuracy. Laboratories report net peptide content, and peptides ship as salts, so an honestly filled vial commonly assays below its gross label — a figure under 100% is not evidence of a short vial. These numbers are also not comparable between vendors: they exist only where a laboratory reports net content, so they partly reflect which laboratory a vendor uses.
Holding a certificate for this vendor that is not here? Send it to the archive →
Same third-party review signals shown on the vendor board. Click Trustpilot or Pep Review Pro to open the source profile.
PB score is the number you should read first on this page. It starts with trust evidence, pricing coverage, and third-party review signals from Finnrick, Peptide Critic, Trustpilot, and Pep Review Pro when available. Reviewed transparency evidence contributes a bounded amount — shown as a trust lift for source-benchmarked vendors, and folded into the base score for PB-evidence vendors.
This vendor’s score is evidence-first: verifiable testing evidence forms the backbone, and outside review sources are a bounded adjustment that can warn far more than it can boost. The terms below sum to the displayed score (small rounding aside). Full formula on the scoring methodology page.
WHAT THIS PAGE IS
- Board-ranked vendor profile with source-linked benchmark inputs
- No Finnrick score currently linked
- No Peptide Critic score currently linked
- No Trustpilot profile currently linked
- No Pep Review Pro profile currently linked
CURRENT LIMITS
- Not an original lab test or editorial review
- Source scales and methodologies differ across sites
- Depends on source site freshness and formatting
METHODOLOGY
How to read this benchmark
This profile summarizes public benchmark data synced from Finnrick and, when available, Peptide Critic. Finnrick contributes a 10-point average from its vendor table, while Peptide Critic contributes a 5-star rating that we normalize to a 10-point scale before ranking consensus entries.
A high score can be directionally useful, but it is not a substitute for current COAs, identity testing, chain-of-custody details, or your own due diligence. We are intentionally separating source aggregation from first-party editorial claims.
Scores combine PB trust evidence with external signals from Finnrick, Peptide Critic, Trustpilot, and Pep Review Pro when available.