BENCHMARK PROFILE
Lyra Vital
Latest sync: Oct 3, 2026, 9:44 AM. Source coverage currently reflects PB Evidence data.
Readers who want an openly priced U.S. catalog with a public Janoshik image archive and who will read the manufacturer client name on those certificates before treating them as Lyra Vital’s own tests.
Vendor-stated: Lyra Vital LLC, Orlando, FL; [email protected]; ships to all 50 states. Standard shipping is $12, or free on merchandise over $200 after discounts and before tax. Express is $29 at every order value. Orders dispatch within one business day of cleared payment; orders that clear after 2:00 pm Eastern, on weekends, or on holidays dispatch the next business day. No street address is published. Observed September 28, 2026.
Lyra Vital LLC’s public founding date is July 16, 2026 — a new storefront. Published Janoshik certificates name Cocer Peptides as the client and manufacturer, not Lyra Vital. The vendor says several retail sizes can be filled from one certified bulk lot, so the mass on a certificate can differ from the vial size for sale (including a BPC-157 report measured near 21 mg beside 5 mg and 10 mg listings, a Glutathione certificate for a 600 mg lot beside 750 mg and 1,500 mg listings, and Kisspeptin-10 sold at 5 mg beside 10 mg-lot certificates). The Glow Blend certificate linked from the product page prints separate GHK-Cu, TB-500, and BPC-157 amounts rather than one purity percentage, and the table’s single content figure is the GHK-Cu line. As of October 2, 2026, the Wolverine Blend product page and the certificate it links both name batch CS-t/b55-0403 (Janoshik task 136641). That certificate does not print a purity percentage. The product page describes the thymosin beta-4 content as synthetic full-length thymosin beta-4, consistent with the TB-500 page. Bacteriostatic water stays off the peptide board. The vendor’s own partner program is not a PeptideBenchmark affiliate relationship. Comparison prices are single-vial list prices.
An Orlando-stated research storefront with openly listed single-vial prices and a public certificate archive of Janoshik report images. Those documents resolve at Janoshik under the manufacturer client Cocer Peptides, not under Lyra Vital.
Lyra Vital sells a compact research-only catalog with a price on every size, including branded blends (Glow, Wolverine) and common singles. Each compound page links a public certificate table of current and older batches. The report images are Janoshik Analytical certificates. PeptideBenchmark reads those images and checks the task and key at Janoshik; the client field names Cocer Peptides, the manufacturer Lyra Vital says commissioned the tests. Bacteriostatic water stays off the peptide board.
Each compound has a public certificate table with a vendor-hosted report image and a Janoshik task and key. Readers can open the laboratory route themselves. The printed client is the manufacturer, Cocer Peptides, not Lyra Vital, so these stay named-lab public documents rather than vendor-client–matched verification. A matched document describes the tested sample and the panels printed on it. It does not endorse every vial, and measured content on a certificate can differ from the labeled retail fill.
This vendor is one of 130 names currently included in our manual curated research-vendor layer.
This is a meaningful public transparency pattern, but the documents are still mostly hosted on the vendor side. That makes it stronger than generic claims and weaker than provider-controlled verification.
- Reward the fact that readers can inspect real files without logging in.
- Pay attention to whether the archive is broad, multi-category, or repeated across many products.
- Keep in mind that vendor-hosted files are different from a live third-party verification portal.
This vendor makes the most sense when you compare it to other vendors using a similar transparency model, rather than to every vendor on the board at once.
PB Curated Assessment is a PeptideBenchmark-authored rubric built from the trust and transparency review layer. It is separate from the source-derived benchmark score.
Lyra Vital has enough public trust structure to be useful in the curated set, even if it is not one of the clearest verification leaders yet.
Readers can inspect real public documents, even if the vendor still hosts most of the archive.
The trust layer is structured and inspectable, but still mostly vendor-controlled.
Current review touched 28 products and 162 document/link destinations.
1 named lab signal(s) and 1 certification category signal(s) are currently visible in the reviewed evidence.
Score 6.0 from pb evidence score.
PB Curated Assessment: Promising. This is our own trust/transparency rubric and is kept separate from the PB score.
Under the formula retired on Aug 28, 2026 this vendor scores 6.13 — the live evidence-first score is 6.35 (+0.22). What changed and why: scoring methodology.
Assayed content is not fill accuracy. Laboratories report net peptide content, and peptides ship as salts, so an honestly filled vial commonly assays below its gross label — a figure under 100% is not evidence of a short vial. These numbers are also not comparable between vendors: they exist only where a laboratory reports net content, so they partly reflect which laboratory a vendor uses.
Holding a certificate for this vendor that is not here? Send it to the archive →
Same third-party review signals shown on the vendor board. Click Trustpilot or Pep Review Pro to open the source profile.
PB score is the number you should read first on this page. It starts with trust evidence, pricing coverage, and third-party review signals from Finnrick, Peptide Critic, Trustpilot, and Pep Review Pro when available. Reviewed transparency evidence contributes a bounded amount — shown as a trust lift for source-benchmarked vendors, and folded into the base score for PB-evidence vendors.
This vendor’s score is evidence-first: verifiable testing evidence forms the backbone, and outside review sources are a bounded adjustment that can warn far more than it can boost. The terms below sum to the displayed score (small rounding aside). Full formula on the scoring methodology page.
WHAT THIS PAGE IS
- Board-ranked vendor profile with source-linked benchmark inputs
- No Finnrick score currently linked
- No Peptide Critic score currently linked
- No Trustpilot profile currently linked
- No Pep Review Pro profile currently linked
CURRENT LIMITS
- Not an original lab test or editorial review
- Source scales and methodologies differ across sites
- Depends on source site freshness and formatting
These are representative public examples from the vendor testing review queue. They show how product pages in the catalog expose public report or verification paths, but they should still be read as examples rather than proof for every current lot.
In other words: the relationship registry above captures the vendor-to-provider link itself, while the examples below show what that link looks like across real product pages.
METHODOLOGY
How to read this benchmark
This profile summarizes public benchmark data synced from Finnrick and, when available, Peptide Critic. Finnrick contributes a 10-point average from its vendor table, while Peptide Critic contributes a 5-star rating that we normalize to a 10-point scale before ranking consensus entries.
A high score can be directionally useful, but it is not a substitute for current COAs, identity testing, chain-of-custody details, or your own due diligence. We are intentionally separating source aggregation from first-party editorial claims.
Scores combine PB trust evidence with external signals from Finnrick, Peptide Critic, Trustpilot, and Pep Review Pro when available.