BENCHMARK PROFILE
LA Peptides
Latest sync: Oct 14, 2026, 12:07 AM. Source coverage currently reflects Consensus data.
REFERRAL OFFER
35% off with disclosed code
Limited-time boost through Oct 19
Standing PeptideBenchmark code: 10% off. LA Peptides requires a free members account (21+) to browse products; enter the code at checkout. Confirmed at checkout on the rebuilt store on October 6, 2026, during a limited-time LA Peptides sale, when it gave more than the standing 10% and did not combine with the sale’s own code.
PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with LA Peptides. This does not change benchmark scores or trust ratings — it only affects outbound links and pricing-board discount modeling where applicable.
Readers with a free LA Peptides members account who want to check their own lot: find the lot’s certificate in the COA portal, then confirm its printed code at Bioviridian or Freedom Diagnostics.
A reader needs a free LA Peptides account to confirm a board price (latest observed October 5, 2026). A certificate covers a single lot, so match the batch on your vial to its certificate before relying on a result. LAP-1 (S), LAP-2 (T) and LAP-3 (R) are LA Peptides’ house labels for semaglutide, tirzepatide and retatrutide. The CJC No DAC / Ipamorelin listing reads 5 mg, but a Bioviridian certificate for it (COA5220, lot 1318) measured 5.81 mg and 5.32 mg of its two peptides, so the board compares that vial as 10 mg in total.
Included because LA Peptides pairs a broad catalog, compared on the pricing board, with certificates that readers can confirm at the issuing laboratory: Bioviridian Inc. Web Verification Codes at bioviridians.com and Freedom Diagnostics report codes at that laboratory’s own lookup.
LA Peptides rebuilt its storefront in early October 2026. Every page, including product pages and prices, now opens only after a free members sign-up that asks visitors to confirm they are 21 or older and buying for research use. The pricing board compares 57 offers from LA Peptides’ catalog. In PeptideBenchmark’s certificate record, last reviewed October 6, 2026, 134 of 153 certificate-to-product relationships were verified at the issuing laboratory; the record also keeps entries from LA Peptides’ previous site, which no longer serves them. Reported purity averages about 99.7%.
LA Peptides lists its certificates in a members-area COA portal, and its site says the QR code on each vial label opens that lot’s certificate. A Bioviridian Inc. certificate’s Web Verification Code (for example COA5201) opens the laboratory’s own copy at bioviridians.com, and a Freedom Diagnostics report, opened by its report code at the laboratory, names LA Peptides as the client. PeptideBenchmark’s certificate record, last reviewed October 6, 2026, holds 153 certificate-to-product relationships, including 100 backed by a Bioviridian certificate and 37 by a Freedom Diagnostics report; 134 were verified at the issuing laboratory. Of 61 products with a certificate, an endotoxin result appears for 44, a heavy-metals panel for 34 and a sterility test for 27.
This vendor is one of 131 names currently included in our manual curated research-vendor layer.
This is the strongest public transparency pattern on the site. The key signal is that readers can leave the vendor domain and inspect reports or verification pages on an outside provider domain without needing to log in.
- Treat the outside provider route as the strongest part of the evidence, not the vendor marketing copy around it.
- Look for repeated product-level behavior across the catalog, not just one showcase example.
- Do not overread it as proof that every current lot is covered or current unless the linked report trail itself supports that.
This vendor makes the most sense when you compare it to other vendors using a similar transparency model, rather than to every vendor on the board at once.
PB Curated Assessment is a PeptideBenchmark-authored rubric built from the trust and transparency review layer. It is separate from the source-derived benchmark score.
LA Peptides is currently one of the strongest curated cases on the site because readers can inspect a repeatable public evidence trail without logging in.
Readers can leave the vendor marketing layer and inspect verification publicly.
This is the strongest public pattern because the verification step routes into an outside provider layer.
Current review touched 85 products and 153 document/link destinations.
3 named lab signal(s) and 1 certification category signal(s) are currently visible in the reviewed evidence.
Score 9.2 from 10-point benchmark blend.
PB Curated Assessment: Strong. This is our own trust/transparency rubric and is kept separate from the PB score.
Under the formula retired on Aug 28, 2026 this vendor scores 8.86 — the live evidence-first score is 9.58 (+0.72). What changed and why: scoring methodology.
Observed from public domain records and the vendor's own site on Aug 27, 2026. Identity facts are shown for context and do not affect scores.
Assayed content is not fill accuracy. Laboratories report net peptide content, and peptides ship as salts, so an honestly filled vial commonly assays below its gross label — a figure under 100% is not evidence of a short vial. These numbers are also not comparable between vendors: they exist only where a laboratory reports net content, so they partly reflect which laboratory a vendor uses.
Holding a certificate for this vendor that is not here? Send it to the archive →
Same third-party review signals shown on the vendor board. Click Trustpilot or Pep Review Pro to open the source profile.
PB score is the number you should read first on this page. It starts with trust evidence, pricing coverage, and third-party review signals from Finnrick, Peptide Critic, Trustpilot, and Pep Review Pro when available. Reviewed transparency evidence contributes a bounded amount — shown as a trust lift for source-benchmarked vendors, and folded into the base score for PB-evidence vendors.
This vendor’s score is evidence-first: verifiable testing evidence forms the backbone, and outside review sources are a bounded adjustment that can warn far more than it can boost. The terms below sum to the displayed score (small rounding aside). Full formula on the scoring methodology page.
WHAT THIS PAGE IS
- Board-ranked vendor profile with source-linked benchmark inputs
- No Finnrick score currently linked
- Includes Peptide Critic score coverage
- No Trustpilot profile currently linked
- No Pep Review Pro profile currently linked
CURRENT LIMITS
- Not an original lab test or editorial review
- Source scales and methodologies differ across sites
- Depends on source site freshness and formatting
These are source-backed transparency links between this vendor and testing providers. They are not the same thing as independent confirmation that every current lot matches every posted report.
- Vendor claims testing with: the vendor publicly names the provider.
- Public reports hosted at: the vendor publicly routes users to report pages from that provider.
- Provider-authored reports hosted on vendor domain: the vendor publicly hosts report files that identify an outside lab as the issuing provider.
- COA verification hosted at: the vendor publicly routes users to provider-run verification pages.
These are representative public examples from the vendor testing review queue. They show how product pages in the catalog expose public report or verification paths, but they should still be read as examples rather than proof for every current lot.
In other words: the relationship registry above captures the vendor-to-provider link itself, while the examples below show what that link looks like across real product pages.
METHODOLOGY
How to read this benchmark
This profile summarizes public benchmark data synced from Finnrick and, when available, Peptide Critic. Finnrick contributes a 10-point average from its vendor table, while Peptide Critic contributes a 5-star rating that we normalize to a 10-point scale before ranking consensus entries.
A high score can be directionally useful, but it is not a substitute for current COAs, identity testing, chain-of-custody details, or your own due diligence. We are intentionally separating source aggregation from first-party editorial claims.
Scores combine PB trust evidence with external signals from Finnrick, Peptide Critic, Trustpilot, and Pep Review Pro when available.