CURATED VENDOR PROFILE
Biolinx Labs
A U.S. research storefront with public vial prices, labeled strengths and Accumark certificates naming Biolinx Labs that can be checked at the laboratory.
REFERRAL OFFER
Partner code · no additional discount during BOGO with disclosed code
PEPTIDE10 was accepted in anonymous carts on October 30, 2026. The store explicitly said the code tracks the sale but is not used on BOGO orders; the charged coupon discount remained $0. The public promotion provides one free eligible vial per order, regardless of purchased quantity. No extra 10% savings or unlimited free-vial offer is applied to comparison prices. PeptideBenchmark may earn commission.
PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with Biolinx Labs. This does not change benchmark scores or trust ratings — it only affects outbound links and pricing-board discount modeling where applicable.
Same formula for every vendor: verifiable testing evidence forms the backbone; third-party reviews adjust it within a bounded range. How scoring works →
Score breakdown
Rank Composition — the terms below are the published receipt for this score. Full formula on the methodology page.
- Verified-evidence backbone
- 6.20
- Third-party reviews (bounded)
- +0.00
- Curated review bonus
- +0.15
The complete catalog contains 67 product and size entries, including multi-product bundles and reconstitution supplies. The archive contains 24 distinct reports. Exact compound-and-strength matches cover 19 of 67 entries; an attached report does not resolve contradictory product identities or cover every available strength.
Researchers comparing labeled single-vial list prices while examining measured content, report dates and exact compound identities.
Prices withheld from comparison: TB-500 10 mg, GLOW 70 mg and KLOW 80 mg. The TB-500 product and its report disagree on fragment versus full-length identity. GLOW mixes fragment wording with full-length specifications, and GLOW/KLOW purchase selectors say 50MG alongside 70/80 mg catalog sizes. KLOW also publishes conflicting Lys-Pro-Val specifications. CJC-1295 DAC is included using its formula, mass, linker description and laboratory identity; CAS alone does not establish a non-DAC conflict. The BPC-157/TB-500 fragment blends use total blend mass with no assumed component ratio; their reports do not establish exact fragment identity. The IGF-1 LR3 and CJC-1295 DAC reports print purity results below the laboratory specification. PeptideBenchmark became a disclosed affiliate on October 30, 2026 and may earn commission. PEPTIDE10 was accepted for partner attribution but gave no additional coupon discount during the current BOGO. The public BOGO allows one free vial per order; it is not applied as an unlimited discount in comparisons.
U.S.-based, delivery to all 50 states, FedEx 2-Day at $19.93 and advertised free shipping above $200. The published noon Eastern business-day cutoff is a vendor fulfillment claim. No precise business or fulfillment address was established from the reviewed pages.
Checked October 30, 2026Public Accumark reports with exact laboratory document verification
24 reports match the independently acquired laboratory PDF under the printed Biolinx Labs client, sample code, lot and purity. Results below the laboratory purity specification remain visible. 4 reports include endotoxin results and rapid PCR screening; PCR screening is not compendial USP <71> sterility testing. No heavy-metal panel was observed.
8 public certificate examples
Representative product pages showing how this catalog exposes report or verification paths. Examples, not proof for every current lot.
Assayed content is not fill accuracy. Laboratories report net peptide content, and peptides ship as salts, so an honestly filled vial commonly assays below its gross label — a figure under 100% is not evidence of a short vial. These numbers are also not comparable between vendors: they exist only where a laboratory reports net content, so they partly reflect which laboratory a vendor uses.
Holding a certificate for this vendor that is not here? Send it to the archive →