Each value keeps its acquisition path attached. Missing fields are shown rather than inferred. Confidence describes extraction and attribution—not result quality.
Provenance corrected · Oct 9, 2026. We had labelled the laboratory on this record “Document extracted”, as if we read it from the certificate. It came from our collection for Oros Research, which takes the laboratory from Oros Research’s COA listing and, when the listing names none, attributes one from the format of the lot number, without recording which one supplied the value. It is now labelled “Vendor stated”, which marks a value that rests on the vendor’s listing rather than on the certificate; the value is unchanged. How we label provenance
PRODUCT RELATIONSHIP
No exact catalog match
This certificate remains searchable evidence, but PB has not connected it to a current catalog product by exact normalized URL.
UNMATCHED BY DESIGN
02 / PANEL COVERAGE
Panel evidence and provenance
Lab-verified and document-extracted panels count as certificate coverage. Vendor-stated panels remain visible, but are not represented as results from this document.
● In document
HPLC / purity
>99% Manual review
● In document
Mass spectrometry / identity
confirmed Document extracted
◆ Vendor stated only
Measured quantity
Panel listed Vendor stated
○ Not extracted
Sterility
No result captured No provenance
● In document
Endotoxin
<85 Document extracted
● In document
Heavy metals
Pass Document extracted
4 of 6standard panels supported by this certificate · 1 vendor-stated claim shown separately
03 / LABORATORY
Verification surface
—
No provider lookup attached
Ethos Analytics
This record currently relies on the vendor-hosted certificate and PB’s preserved copy. That is a weaker verification surface than a lab-controlled lookup.